Not really, they lost their way with last years calendar, now they're
wandering around in an open field trying to cater to their new art
constituency. Too bad it doesn't really exist.
It's a pinup calendar, the women in it aren't supposed to be real,
They're either a fantasy or idealized, depending on how charitable I
want to be.
It's not like the people who approve, of this "more realistic" calendar
are actually going to hang one on their wall, and the guy, (and it is
mostly guy's), who is going to hang one in their automobile repair bay
are going to actually want this.
So it gets critical acclaim from the usual suspects, and, a little more
joy is sucked out of the life of some ordinary Joe, so Pirelli can make
a stupid, and not particularly valid, post modern, point.
On 12/21/2016 12:45 AM, Ken Waller wrote:
Sorry but the new calendar just doesn't cut it for me.
I much prefer the earlier editions of the calendar.
Its like Pirelli is asking me to like a bald worn out tire instead of
one of their new super sticky P-Zeros.
I think they've lost their direction with this edition.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry Colen" <l...@red4est.com>
Subject: Pirelli goes natural
Peter Lindbergh shot this years Pirelli Calendar without using makeup
or retouching.
https://www.fastcocreate.com/3066063/quick-hit/the-2017-pirelli-calendar-with-nicole-kidman-and-julianne-moore-is-raw-and-unretou
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
