I used a K7 for about 4 years. I shot mostly in bright light. Good up to
ISO 400, tolerable at 800, hopeless beyond. (About the same as my
K110D!) Now I have a K5 which is OK even at 3200. Everything else seems
much the same as the K7. No electronic problems. Can't imagine why your
AF was so bad?
Alan C
On 06/01/2018 6:48 PM, Bill wrote:
On 6/1/2018 10:42 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Nice to know my kipping it was a good move.
Thanks, Bill!
I was shooting a lot of studio at the time, so the K7 was very good
for me. It ended up being a far better camera than the K5 in my hands
as I got a Friday afternoon K5 that had pretty much every electronics
problem that the thing was noted for.
The AF on my K5 was worse than useless.
You slept through the K7?
bill
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
