>Ah, yes:) They probably thought the same way... "Why should we do anything >to convince the customers to buy our cameras if they don't want to? OUR >market position wasn't APPRECIATED! We are offended" Other producers, >however, weren't offended and exploited the chance... Pentax don't do >cameras for a charity purposes but to profit by them, remember?:) Why >should they have updated the camera that didn't meet their sales goal? To >finally
You sure have vivid imagination, although what you have imagined might be true. :) >meet it. And they should have let all the people know that they updated it >and that they care for their customers... But the fact remains that not many customers on earth gave a damn about the Z/PZ-1p, or the whole Z/PZ series for that matter. By dumping more resource into this nobody-gave-a-damn darkhole, Pentax might have been dead already by now. regards, Alan Chan _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
