Apart from their technical quality I think Leica's have compact elegant
designs and some people may buy it as fashion gadgets.
I don't expect DSLR's can find that niche in current markets accordingly.
In my opinion it is important for R/P to hold on to their line of very
versatile rugged APS-C and FF DSLR's, but not to eliminate features in
striving to (more) compactness.
Olympus was doomed because of all their cards on MFT format and the
trend to greater sensors.
Henk
Op 2020-09-08 om 14:04 schreef P. J. Alling:
Perhaps Ricoh/Pentax is planning to follow the Leica route of going
against the main stream for a small public.
That would seem to be the way to go if you're a small player in a market.
Trying to compete against the big boys doesn't seem to have done
Olympus any good, even though they used the newest tech they could to
enhance their retro offerings.
Sony has decided to spend all it's corporate treasury to capture the
mainstream photographic market, and Nikon and Canon seem to be
unwilling to go quietly into oblivion, while Panasonic wants to give
Sony a run for it's money. That doesn't leave much for a small player.
If Pentax want's to become the Leica of the Pentaprism, and can
manage it, that just gives photographers more options.
On 9/6/2020 4:49 PM, Henk Terhell wrote:
A camera nowadays has so many features and no doubt many customers
use ony a part of them. As an example I've never used the video of my
DSLR's.
But no way I would buy now a camera with fixed screen, because with
the K-1 I'm tilting the screen in perhaps a quart of my shots in
nature.
We have to wait and see what improvements the new APS-C will bring
besides the brighter OVF, but I wonder about the appreciation of the
fixed screen when introduced on the market.
Perhaps Ricoh/Pentax is planning to follow the Leica route of going
against the main stream for a small public.
Henk
Op 2020-09-06 om 21:01 schreef Bruce Walker:
On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 at 10:30, Henk Terhell <hterhell at chello.nl>
wrote:
https://pentaxofficial.com/en/6628/
Well, as expected, the die is cast: the new flagship will have a
fixed LCD screen.
Wrong decisions by R/P....
I have a tilt-up screen on my 645Z which I *never* use. I only ever
shoot using the OVF so the LCD remains flat against the body.
Ironically, I am considering substituting a (tilting LCD) K-1 for my
(non-tilting) K-3 as my backup/alternate body, and I would treat that
tiltable K-1 LCD the same way: stuck resolutely to the back. Can't use
an LCD viewscreen for shooting; don't need an LCD viewscreen for
shooting.
And really, since Ricoh/Pentax has decided to stick with the OVF and
forgo mirrorless designs, favouring the OVF is a reasonable way to go.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.