On 2 Aug 2002 at 18:16, Artur Led�chowski wrote:

> It seems that NGH II 800 nicely compensates for different color temperature of
> the available light. It's grain and sharpness seems to be really good, too. I
> definitely have to give it a try... I especially like the pic of the woman
> looking up. It's a nice portrait.

Hi Artur,

I too like NGH II 800 very much for its wide latitude and low contrast, it's 
great for many high contrast applications. The pics that I presented were 
however shot with my Oly E-10.

On 2 Aug 2002 at 18:36, Lukasz Kacperczyk wrote:

> I too like the portrait of the woman best. IMHO it's the only one of these
> photos that doesn't need cropping. But otherwise they are very good - I love
> blurred pictures (I'm in the "bokeh- blurry-slow-shutter" period now :)
> 
> BTW - as Artur has already mentioned, very natural skin colors (well,
> bearing in mind indoor lighs of course).

Hi Lukasz,

I just wish the effective ISO of the Oly was higher, as the light was very poor 
so the exposure was 0.5s and the subject moved. I set the colour balance for 
warm tungsten light I didn't white balance but if I had the skin colour would 
have been near perfect.

On 2 Aug 2002 at 13:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Rob.
> 
> I wonder, does your Olympus have slow speed flash sync?
>  I have found that these smaller gigs with their limited lighting ie no white
>  follow spots, often benefit from a slow speed with fill approach - around 1/8th
>  or so often works. I know we are "not supposed to" use flash but Frits has a
>  nice example of what I mean - unless he has dumped it?? (It's on my broken
>  drive). Also the predominantly reddish lighting doesn't help; switching to
>  tungsten like a lot of photo magazine features suggest is simply ghastly. I
>  will await your LXen pix with bated breath.

Hi Peter,

The Oly has SS Sync and full FS to 1/640th however I flash wasn't appropriate 
in this instance. (+Paul) The LXen pix may be a while away, have to sell some 
gear on the Bay before I can afford a new LS8000 scanner, that is of course 
unless the Pentax DSLR doesn't come first (I think I'm safe).

On 2 Aug 2002 at 16:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> UGH! I've done this myself!

> Rob, I totally sympathize with your plight here. It's a tricky environment to
> shoot in. I've been doing a lot of shooting of bands lately and it's definately
> a harrowing experience. I have had good luck simply pushing 800 color neg and,
> of course, pushing Tri-X.

There is no excuse however .....it was reaalllyyy loud and I would normally 
have heard the camera also since it was dark I couldn't really see indicators 
in the finder too well plus they only played for one short set so it was pretty 
rushed and I was sharing the lens set amongst two bodies. I kicked myself for 
not double checking like I should have. :-(
 
> Here's a couple I got recently of a group in San Francisco. These were taken
> with the LX (with the SC-69), 85mm f1.4, on consumer 800 rated 1600 and pushed.
> I didn't use any color correction:
> I was able to get some fairly quick speeds out of the LX (1/125?) as I recall
> that night. Most of the shots were wide open on aperture-priority. It appears as
> though your group didn't have nearly the same amount of light on them. I was
> lucky enough to put the word out that I needed more light so the guy I knew in
> the band had the tech leave the house lights at 50% for the whole show. This
> made all the difference. That allowed me to go from a 1/8 to a 1/30 at center
> stage. I figured as long as they don't jump around too much I'd be OK. I still
> managed to shoot mostly at 1/60 sec or slightly faster as the lights changed
> throughout the show.

Hi Brendan,

Great shots, I hope I get out of it that well, you're quite right too the 
lights were crappy old style spots all gelled and the lighting guy had had one 
too many tokes I suspect :-) 

When I was with it and aware I was seeing shutter speeds of 1/30 and 1/60th on 
occasions. They are a pretty active bunch so I'm just hoping that they're 
recognizable, I would have like to have been shooting at 1600 as it would have 
given me a little more latitude. I used all the lenses wide open, I shot 
sitting on the ground, standing and resting lightly on the fold back speakers 
(24mm straight up), it looked pretty interesting in the finder.

Cheers,

Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to