If it has the motor drive attached, the F3 is probably heavier.
Though I guess I could go through my reference material and come
up with a weight for the F3 with, and without, a motor drive.

Len
---



----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2002 4:13 PM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Subject: LX repair update


> >I think that the comparison to the F3 is a bit unfair by the
way.  It is
> >much bigger,
> >almost as large and heavy as a Pentax 67.  If you can't build
in
> >reliability by using bigger heavier parts then you're doing
> >something wrong.
>
> Perhaps you mixed up the F3 with F4 or F5. I don't see how the
Nikon F3 can
> be as big or heavy as P67.
>
> regards,
> Alan Chan
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________
_
> Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger:
http://messenger.msn.com
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To
unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to