If it has the motor drive attached, the F3 is probably heavier. Though I guess I could go through my reference material and come up with a weight for the F3 with, and without, a motor drive.
Len --- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2002 4:13 PM Subject: Re: Re[2]: Subject: LX repair update > >I think that the comparison to the F3 is a bit unfair by the way. It is > >much bigger, > >almost as large and heavy as a Pentax 67. If you can't build in > >reliability by using bigger heavier parts then you're doing > >something wrong. > > Perhaps you mixed up the F3 with F4 or F5. I don't see how the Nikon F3 can > be as big or heavy as P67. > > regards, > Alan Chan > > > ________________________________________________________________ _ > Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .