Hi,

when my LXs were stolen the insurance company first offered me 3 F3s
with MD-4s as replacements because they thought they were the nearest
current equivalent to the LX. I went to a camera shop to see how they
compared. Lifted one F3+MD4 and decided there and then, based on the
weight & size alone, that this was not the camera for me. They are
real monsters.

---

 Bob  

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sunday, August 4, 2002, 12:26:39 AM, you wrote:

> That makes the F3 wth MD just a tad heavier than a Pentax 67II
> body only.  Somehow I thought thhe F3 with drive would be a bit
> heavier than that.

> Len
> ---

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2002 5:00 PM
> Subject: Re: Re[2]: Subject: LX repair update


>> In a message dated 8/3/2002 2:41:29 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>
>>
>> > If it has the motor drive attached, the F3 is probably
> heavier.
>> > Though I guess I could go through my reference material and
> come
>> > up with a weight for the F3 with, and without, a motor
> drive.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> F3 weight, 715G
>> MD-4 motor drive, 480G
>>
>> -Brendan MacRae
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to