They haven't been around that long.
At 06:44 AM 8/21/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>The fact that that phrase was in the quoted message does not mean that I was
>commenting on that exact issue. I stated what my comment was about.
>
>If you insist on me commenting upon the depreciation issue, let me point out
>that I did address it in the clarification. To wit:
>
>"Heck, you have a hard time giving away an old computer right now, but there
>are a lot of folks right here chasing hard after old SLRs."
>
>The price of a used D30 and other interchangeable lens DSLRs are a lot
>higher than used computers.
>
>Len
>---
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Rob Brigham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 4:09 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Today's rant: Alright, already.
>
>
>But your reply started "I don't think digital SLRs will follow the
>depreciation of computers". Maybe you read English, but you obviously
>don't understand it if you now claim you were talking about new prices
>and not resale value.
>
>Against logic like yours, I am forced to give up...
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Len Paris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 21 August 2002 00:36
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Today's rant: Alright, already.
> >
> >
> > You can argue what you want to argue. I know what the e-mail
> > I responded to said. I *do* read English. My reply
> > addressed the new prices of digital cameras, not their resale
> > value. It was my response. It was my opinion. You are
> > welcome to yours.
> >
> > Len
> > ---
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Rob Brigham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 5:57 PM
> > Subject: RE: Today's rant: Alright, already.
> >
> >
> > > But the mail you were relying to said "I wonder if these
> > expensive
> > > digital cameras will retain their value like film cameras, or
> > as I
> > > suspect, they will follow the depreciation of computers."
> > Depreciation
> > > does not refer to the new price variance of anything. To be
> > honest,
> > > what you are saying about new DSLRS is actually not that far
> > different
> > > from PCs. New PCs have not come down as drastically in price
> > as you
> > > might think(unless you buy a cheapo non brand low spec one) -
> > you just
> > > get a lot more for your money. Folks may be chasing old SLRs,
> > but not
> > > old DSLRs!
> > -
> > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
> > unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
> > directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery
> > at http://pug.komkon.org .
>-
>This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
>go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
>visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>-
>This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
>go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
>visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
