On 31 Aug 2002 at 0:40, Simon Storey wrote: > I've read around this a bit, on the marvellous 'Boz' site and others, but > in real life, what's the difference between an F and FA version of the same > lens? Yes, a generational thing, early vs late with less electronics, but what > difference will it make to it's use? How would using one and not the other be > different? > > Could anyone put into a simple paragraph for me? ;-)
I have pretty limited experience when it comes to F/FA lenses but it appear to me that FA lenses with the same formulation as their F counterparts seemed better built and had a more user friendly manual focus option. The LTD lenses take this progression to the next level and have almost gone full circle to present an AF lens that feels more like a traditional MF(ocus) lens. Cheers, Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
