on 10/01/02 9:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Why would it take them so much time to revamp their product after the demise
> of the MZ-D? Canon and Nikon are coming out with new cameras with new
> sensors at a phenominal rate in order to capture the market, and they may be
> about to capture my meagre share. Why couldn't Pentax just do a quick
> turnaround with another viable chip and introduce the damn thing? A new
> sensor, a bit of new electronics and software updates, but it should not
> take them this long to respond to market demands. Its not like hey needed to
> totally redesign the thing; the MZ-D was gorgeous, and just what we have
> been clamouring for. This is beyond slow; its ridiculous.
>
> Cameron
>
> on 10/01/02 12:20 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 20:11:09 +0200
>> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E5l_Jensen?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Re: New Pentax Product's/Photokina
>> Message-ID: <001701c26975$ec67a220$b7ad4382@oemcomputer>
>> Content-Type: text/plain;
>> charset="iso-8859-1"
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>>
>>> on 01.10.02 19:19, Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce) at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> They are playing with stuff in the lab. They have nothing close to a
>>>> production sample.
>>
>>
>> I assume this is about the digital slr. In fact, the pentax digital slr was
>> manufactured but not marketed. There are many units in daily use in Japan by
>> photographers with Pentax connection. The production line is in place and
>> test
>> production was started.
>>
>>
>> Pål
