> By then it probably wont be worth much so I would likely keep it as a > backup and for long shots where the focal multiplier is useful(of course > if the resolution of the full frame version I replace it with is high > enough, I could just crop/zoom that rather than rely on a smaller > sensor). Yes, I probably do have too much money - the big problem is > getting the expense past the missus 8-)
Heh...the missus, I don't have to worry about that for a while :) > A sensible choice, but constant exposure to digital 'enablement' may > make the move irresistable before it becomes sensible!! I know that's > the case with me. One of the reasons I bought the MZ-S was that I > thought I would have a digital body with the same interface to add much > later. Yes, sensible, for now.... You are right however, I'm bad with money and if I have it (money) and Pentax has it (the DSLR) then I would no doubt spend it :) I saw the pictures of the MZ-D after I bought the MZ-S, and didn't even know about the MZ-D in fact. But wow, that MZ-D looked oh so very nice..... BD
