I know, it's odd, and it doesn't make much or any sense. But well....neither does Pentax either :)
Brad Dobo ----- Original Message ----- From: "Treena Harp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 2:05 AM Subject: Re: Thoughts on a film flagship > So ... let me get this straight :) -- you're worried about your current > lenses not working with future DSLRs, so you're now considering getting even > older equipment ... Yep, sounds like Pentax 'old-fart syndrome' to me. Join > us ... join us ... > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Brad Dobo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 11:11 PM > Subject: Re: Thoughts on a film flagship > > > > > > It must be this group I think :) Maybe I should have hunted around for > the > > LX and some used lenses. I could be wrong, but which was developed first? > > The real MZ-S as a 35mm SLR or the 'MZ-D' that when abandoned, was > converted > > to film? I'm also afraid of my existing lens not working with future > DSLRS. > > Oh the other hand however, I love the MZ-S, I'm proud of it and what I can > > do with it. I think the PDML old-fart syndrome in getting to me :)))) > > > > Brad Dobo > > > > >
