Hallo Sylwek I'd like to se those tests too! Cheers Jens, Denmark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Sylwester Pietrzyk [mailto:sylwek@;ozon.com.pl] Sendt: 30. oktober 2002 14:32 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: 35mm film scanners on 30.10.02 14:14, Pål Jensen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Looking for a film scanner for 35mm. How about the Nikon LS-40 and the Minolta > Dimage scan Dual II and Dimage dual scan III (the two Minolta scanners cost > the same - whats the difference between them?)? > How do these scanners compare to the Nikon LS-4000 (too expensive). Will they > give credit for the Epson 2100 (2200 US) printer? > Plan of using the new 3200DPI Epson flatbed scanner for MF. > I think LS-40 is the best of them three. But new Minolta can be interesting too. Dual Scan III has Minolta's equivalents of Digital ICE3, USB 2.0 and better D/A converter (48 bit - they claim it gives D=4.8 - don't believe it :-). If you want exact results I can send you PDF file with results of big test made in German Color Foto magazine. Big suprise is that not all scanners has real resolution as it is claimed by their makers... -- Regards Sylwek
