----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 6:02 PM
Subject: Re: Praises and Thank Yous!


> On 31 Oct 2002 at 2:27, Brad Dobo wrote:
>
> > So I looked at the carbon fibres, and I had the
> > money, but I didn't like them, too light.  I wanted something strong,
heavy,
> > where I can plant it in heavy winds and not worry about it.  The 055CB
is that
> > old?  Interesting.  Anyhow, it's all I want in a tripod, sure light is
nice if
> > you have to carry it far, but I like 'em heavy ;-)  No pain, no gain.
>
> Brad,
>
> You gotta think outside the square dude, light means that you can get
where you
> need to go with more of the gear that actually makes the photos. Carbon
tripods
> are better at dissipating vibrations and if it is too light (which can be
the
> case) then it can easily be weighed down.
>
> Manfrotto make a triangular apron that you fit between the legs that you
can
> either dump photo gear or water bottle or rocks in to weigh down the pod.
>
> I had an 055 for years and I agree that it's a superb 35mm tripod, the
> Manfrotto carbons offer virtually the same dimensions and flexibility. Now
if
> you were serious about a tripod you would have bought an 075 or 058 and a
nice
> chunky 229Pro head :-)
>
> I guess too that you would have found the QR much friendlier (and quite
useful)
> if you had purchased a Manfrotto head.

I like the pain.  Makes a good photo all the more rewarding ;-)  That is,
after I rest in the hot tub for 2 days.

> Cheers,
>
> Rob Studdert
> HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
> Tel +61-2-9554-4110
> UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
>

Reply via email to