On 23 Nov 2002, Heiko Hamann wrote: > I've got a 330RS. I don't know if the 230 is still available where you > live, but in Europe it has been replaced by the 330GS. As the 330GS has
B&H appears to stock the 230, 330GS, and 330RS. > 3MP I would go for it (it has many improvements, too). You won't see a It seemed to be a $40 difference between the cheaper 330 and 230. I kind of figured it was a nobrainer to opt for the 330. > difference between 2MP and 3MP at 4x6. I didn't make a 5x7 with 2MP, but > I think, that you will see a difference here between 2MP and 3MP. With > 3MP 5x7 look fine. She;s not a photographer, so I doubt even 5x7 will be a common size, however, who knows since I plan on picking up (finally) a printer for myself down the line, and she can always print out there or to the local Ritz's Frontier. > Regarding the decision between 330RS and 330GS you can't make something > wrong. The RS is more expensive but it is smaller and offers more > optional equipment (underwater case etc.). But the 330GS has the same > (or even better) picture quality and some interesting features (auto- > bracketing e.g.). Honestly - the GS offers more for its price. But the > RS might be more attractive...;-) I didn't realize the RS was smaller, I didnt seem to notice that part.. It hoguth the only difference was the internal 11mb of memory. Obvisouly,w hen I'm obsessing over details, I didn't obsess over that part! > >I hope this doesn't qualify as buying myself a gift, I swear, I won't > >touch it for at leas tthree months! > LOL. Better buy two... She's not really one fo rpictures, but she's got a little Canon PnS I'd been threatening to replace. Instead of repalcing it with something that's not really much better, outside of the Pentax label onit, of course, perhaps I should get her a digital to better round out the options she has available to her. -- http://www.infotainment.org <-> more fun than a poke in your eye. http://www.eighteenpercent.com <-> photography and portfolio.
