> > True. But that's not a reason for not taking care of the name. > > If you want the tool to be successful, it should be well identified. It > > has to have a name. > OK, I'm certainly willing to hear suggestions. It's not a priority for me, > and I happen to be not very creative with names, so this responsibility > will have to fall to someone else. :)
What do you think of this topic for the conference? 4pm Introduction to Pikeclipse by Bill Welliver -- Bertrand _______________________________________________ pdt-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.riverweb.com/mailman/listinfo/pdt-devel
