Ooops, the CVS viewer shut down. It's back up now, though. I'm not voting on this one, for some reason, I can't bring myself to care what the name is, so I'll leave that up to others to produce a recommendation. That said, Pikeclipse seems okay to me, so we might as well use that. I don't think anything in the codebase necessarily needs to be changed, right? Preferences and such will still be listed under "Pike" or "Pike project", etc... I think that makes most sense.
I'd be glad to set up a virtual server "pikeclipse.gotpike.org", perhaps with an alias to "eclipse.gotpike.org" so that someone who knows about such things can set up an update site. Anyone interested in taking that task on (Bertrand)? Bill On Oct 26, 2007, at 6:51 AM, Markus Ortel wrote: > Hey Bill, > > I just was kidding. But honestly i really think that Pikelipse is a > good > name and branding for that IDE. It remembered me at once for > http://texlipse.sourceforge.net/ which plays with two terms too. > > I also think this name is good for search-engines (e.g > http://pikelipse.gotpike.org/) like google and self-explained. > > Btw: Could you please take a look at > http://hww3.riverweb.com:8080/viewrep/cvs/PDT ? The server seems > not to > respond. > > Thanks, > Markus > > PS: Hey, what's with your vote? ;-D _______________________________________________ pdt-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.riverweb.com/mailman/listinfo/pdt-devel
