> 4. A good backup software suite for Linux.

Care to expand on that? I'm interested and skilless. I mean, skillful.
I mean... care to expand on that?

On 7/29/05, John Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Renegade Penguin wrote:
> > I'm starting to be sorry I joined the lists.  I hoped to meet other
> > people who had an interest in Linux, not people who call each other
> > demons and the like.
> 
> Yeah, I think he speled it incorrectly.  I think he meant daemons :)
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > Why doesn't ONE group take the higher road and offer to change your
> > name?  PLUG.org (as pointed out) belongs to the Provo Linux Users Group.
> 
> Egos, logistics, apathy, etc.
> 
> > I'm disappointed that I got two responses about interesting projects
> > such as rolling your own (or ANY other interesting project going on),
> > but there are 76 (as of this writing) regarding NAMING (or is that
> > flaming?).
> 
> A little more along the lines of your original post:
> 
> No, I haven't been thinking about rolling my own distro (though I did at
> one time).  However, I've got a ton of projects that I'd like to do.
> For starters:
> 
> 1. A nice interface for managing virtual domains in postfix with LDAP
> and cyrus.  Similar in concept to  Phamm[1] but without the ugly
> interface and specific to virtual mail hosting and not the other stuff
> 
> 2. Work on building better enterprise management tools for Gentoo.
> 
> 3. A good interface for configuring and managing a samba server that is
> setup to be a PDC for an NT domain.
> 
> 4. A good backup software suite for Linux.
> 
> 5. Thunderbird plugin for my spamfilter
> 
> 6. A Kerberos KDC on a bootable CD with the key databasestored on a
> flash drive with an encrypted filesystem
> 
> 7. A good configuration and management tool for IPSec tunnels in Linux
> 
> I've got plenty more.  If you're interested in any of them (and that
> goes for anyone) let me know, and maybe we can start a "public service"
> for others.
> 
> > I like how Josh is trying to make POSITIVE distinctions.  How about
> > changing to Columbia River Linux Users Group, or something that doesn't
> > have a .com/.org attached already?  It's almost painless to change the
> > nameservers and domain registration.
> 
> Now are you refering to Josh, or Josh, or Josh, or Josh? Were there only
> 3? Damn, they should all change their names so it isn't so confusing.
> 
> > How about Yet Another Portland Linux Users Group?  It stays within geek
> > tolerance levels for most.  Members could be Yappies (as it seems that
> > there certainly is a lot of talking).  FOR THE MOST PART, I've seen that
> > Linux users like to talk, and generally like each other, and often poke
> > good-natured fun of themselves.
> 
> That's actually quite clever!
> 
> > I could suggest two dozen names if you don't like any of these.
> 
> Have at it, I'm sure people will read.  You know, us being flame and
> confussion junikes and all.
> 
> -John
> [1] http://phamm.rhx.it/
> 
> P.S. Please read this message, minus the project ideas, with a big huge
> fat :)
> _______________________________________________
> PDXLUG (a Portland Linux user group) mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.pdxlug.org/mailman/listinfo/pdxlug
> IRC: irc.freenode.net #pdxlug &amp; #orlug
> 


-- 
-NKO-
_______________________________________________
PDXLUG (a Portland Linux user group) mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pdxlug.org/mailman/listinfo/pdxlug
IRC: irc.freenode.net #pdxlug &amp; #orlug

Reply via email to