I'm looking to release gnupg 1.3.3 this week (actually last week but...) ... folded in and tested is 5.4 and 5.5 compatibility, -Wall changes, working tests and ability to force use of gpg (v1) for gpgme... Sooooo I'll need upload karma for PECL and PECL gnupg
([email protected]) On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm looking to release 1.3.3 this week... folded in and tested is 5.4 and > 5.5 compatibility, -Wall changes, working tests and ability to force use of > gpg (v1) for gpgme... Sooooo I'll need upload karma for PECL and PECL gnupg > > ([email protected]) > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Hannes Magnusson < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Well.. actually.. you could be right :) >> Either way, this is not something you should be worrying about before >> you have worked on the extension. >> >> -Hannes >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Thx. The site seemed to suggest that the magic happened when the >> package was uploaded and package.xml from the upload was parsed. And hence >> the catch-22. Will try tomorrow. >> > >> > -- >> > Jim Jagielski >> > Brief? Mobile >> > >> > On Jul 2, 2013, at 6:27 PM, Hannes Magnusson < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> Once you have committed your changes and updated the package.xml you >> >> should magically gain powers of the package on peclweb as it uses that >> >> data. >> >> >> >> -Hannes >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> To be clear, you can't upload a package without maintainer karma. >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Jim Jagielski >> >>> Brief? Mobile >> >>> >> >>> On Jul 2, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Hannes Magnusson < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Why would you do that before you actually work on it? >> >>>> I don't think thats cool at all. >> >>>> >> >>>> Once you have updated the package and committed stuff it will >> >>>> magically fix itself. >> >>>> If it doesn't, then we can tell you the secret sauce you missed . >> >>>> >> >>>> -Hannes >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>>>> One final nit (sorry): I'm unable to edit the details for gnupg and >> add >> >>>>> myself as the maintainer (nor do I show up in the pulldown) >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Thx. (again!) >> >>>>> >> >>>>> ERROR: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Only the lead maintainer of the package or PEAR administrators can >> edit the >> >>>>> maintainers. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> thx! :) >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Johannes Schlüter < >> [email protected]> >> >>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 12:58 -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >>>>>>>> Thx... just req'd it. Had to request a different username >> (jimjag2) >> >>>>>>>> since >> >>>>>>>> the registration page knows about my current account name >> (jimjag) and >> >>>>>>>> refuses to let me request that one (as it should). >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Ah, I didn't check the requests, just opened accounts. Your old >> request >> >>>>>>> was still there, granted that. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> johannes >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> > >> > -- >> > PECL development discussion Mailing List (http://pecl.php.net/) >> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> > >> > >
