Hi,

I've added you as lead, make sure to have your name in package.xml else
it will be overwritten while uploading the release, i think.

johannes

On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 08:37 -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I'm looking to release gnupg 1.3.3 this week (actually last week
> but...) ... folded in and tested is 5.4 and 5.5 compatibility, -Wall
> changes, working tests and ability to force use of gpg (v1) for
> gpgme... Sooooo I'll need upload karma for PECL and PECL gnupg
> 
> 
> ([email protected])
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>         I'm looking to release 1.3.3 this week... folded in and tested
>         is 5.4 and 5.5 compatibility, -Wall changes, working tests and
>         ability to force use of gpg (v1) for gpgme... Sooooo I'll need
>         upload karma for PECL and PECL gnupg
>         
>         
>         ([email protected])
>         
>         
>         On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Hannes Magnusson
>         <[email protected]> wrote:
>                 Well.. actually.. you could be right :)
>                 Either way, this is not something you should be
>                 worrying about before
>                 you have worked on the extension.
>                 
>                 -Hannes
>                 
>                 
>                 On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Jim Jagielski
>                 <[email protected]> wrote:
>                 > Thx. The site seemed to suggest that the magic
>                 happened when the package was uploaded and package.xml
>                 from the upload was parsed. And hence the catch-22.
>                 Will try tomorrow.
>                 >
>                 > --
>                 > Jim Jagielski
>                 > Brief? Mobile
>                 >
>                 > On Jul 2, 2013, at 6:27 PM, Hannes Magnusson
>                 <[email protected]> wrote:
>                 >
>                 >> Once you have committed your changes and updated
>                 the package.xml you
>                 >> should magically gain powers of the package on
>                 peclweb as it uses that
>                 >> data.
>                 >>
>                 >> -Hannes
>                 >>
>                 >> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Jim Jagielski
>                 <[email protected]> wrote:
>                 >>> To be clear, you can't upload a package without
>                 maintainer karma.
>                 >>>
>                 >>> --
>                 >>> Jim Jagielski
>                 >>> Brief? Mobile
>                 >>>
>                 >>> On Jul 2, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Hannes Magnusson
>                 <[email protected]> wrote:
>                 >>>
>                 >>>> Why would you do that before you actually work on
>                 it?
>                 >>>> I don't think thats cool at all.
>                 >>>>
>                 >>>> Once you have updated the package and committed
>                 stuff it will
>                 >>>> magically fix itself.
>                 >>>> If it doesn't, then we can tell you the secret
>                 sauce you missed .
>                 >>>>
>                 >>>> -Hannes
>                 >>>>
>                 >>>>
>                 >>>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Jim Jagielski
>                 <[email protected]> wrote:
>                 >>>>> One final nit (sorry): I'm unable to edit the
>                 details for gnupg and add
>                 >>>>> myself as the maintainer (nor do I show up in
>                 the pulldown)
>                 >>>>>
>                 >>>>> Thx. (again!)
>                 >>>>>
>                 >>>>> ERROR:
>                 >>>>>
>                 >>>>> Only the lead maintainer of the package or PEAR
>                 administrators can edit the
>                 >>>>> maintainers.
>                 >>>>>
>                 >>>>>
>                 >>>>>
>                 >>>>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Jim Jagielski
>                 <[email protected]> wrote:
>                 >>>>>>
>                 >>>>>> thx! :)
>                 >>>>>>
>                 >>>>>>
>                 >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Johannes
>                 Schlüter <[email protected]>
>                 >>>>>> wrote:
>                 >>>>>>>
>                 >>>>>>> On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 12:58 -0400, Jim
>                 Jagielski wrote:
>                 >>>>>>>> Thx... just req'd it. Had to request a
>                 different username (jimjag2)
>                 >>>>>>>> since
>                 >>>>>>>> the registration page knows about my current
>                 account name (jimjag) and
>                 >>>>>>>> refuses to let me request that one (as it
>                 should).
>                 >>>>>>>
>                 >>>>>>> Ah, I didn't check the requests, just opened
>                 accounts. Your old request
>                 >>>>>>> was still there, granted that.
>                 >>>>>>>
>                 >>>>>>> johannes
>                 >>>>>>>
>                 >>>>>>
>                 >>>>>
>                 >
>                 
>                 > --
>                 > PECL development discussion Mailing List
>                 (http://pecl.php.net/)
>                 > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>                 >
>         
>         
> 
> 



-- 
PECL development discussion Mailing List (http://pecl.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to