Thx!

On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Johannes Schlüter
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I've added you as lead, make sure to have your name in package.xml else
> it will be overwritten while uploading the release, i think.
>
> johannes
>
> On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 08:37 -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > I'm looking to release gnupg 1.3.3 this week (actually last week
> > but...) ... folded in and tested is 5.4 and 5.5 compatibility, -Wall
> > changes, working tests and ability to force use of gpg (v1) for
> > gpgme... Sooooo I'll need upload karma for PECL and PECL gnupg
> >
> >
> > ([email protected])
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >         I'm looking to release 1.3.3 this week... folded in and tested
> >         is 5.4 and 5.5 compatibility, -Wall changes, working tests and
> >         ability to force use of gpg (v1) for gpgme... Sooooo I'll need
> >         upload karma for PECL and PECL gnupg
> >
> >
> >         ([email protected])
> >
> >
> >         On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Hannes Magnusson
> >         <[email protected]> wrote:
> >                 Well.. actually.. you could be right :)
> >                 Either way, this is not something you should be
> >                 worrying about before
> >                 you have worked on the extension.
> >
> >                 -Hannes
> >
> >
> >                 On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Jim Jagielski
> >                 <[email protected]> wrote:
> >                 > Thx. The site seemed to suggest that the magic
> >                 happened when the package was uploaded and package.xml
> >                 from the upload was parsed. And hence the catch-22.
> >                 Will try tomorrow.
> >                 >
> >                 > --
> >                 > Jim Jagielski
> >                 > Brief? Mobile
> >                 >
> >                 > On Jul 2, 2013, at 6:27 PM, Hannes Magnusson
> >                 <[email protected]> wrote:
> >                 >
> >                 >> Once you have committed your changes and updated
> >                 the package.xml you
> >                 >> should magically gain powers of the package on
> >                 peclweb as it uses that
> >                 >> data.
> >                 >>
> >                 >> -Hannes
> >                 >>
> >                 >> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Jim Jagielski
> >                 <[email protected]> wrote:
> >                 >>> To be clear, you can't upload a package without
> >                 maintainer karma.
> >                 >>>
> >                 >>> --
> >                 >>> Jim Jagielski
> >                 >>> Brief? Mobile
> >                 >>>
> >                 >>> On Jul 2, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Hannes Magnusson
> >                 <[email protected]> wrote:
> >                 >>>
> >                 >>>> Why would you do that before you actually work on
> >                 it?
> >                 >>>> I don't think thats cool at all.
> >                 >>>>
> >                 >>>> Once you have updated the package and committed
> >                 stuff it will
> >                 >>>> magically fix itself.
> >                 >>>> If it doesn't, then we can tell you the secret
> >                 sauce you missed .
> >                 >>>>
> >                 >>>> -Hannes
> >                 >>>>
> >                 >>>>
> >                 >>>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Jim Jagielski
> >                 <[email protected]> wrote:
> >                 >>>>> One final nit (sorry): I'm unable to edit the
> >                 details for gnupg and add
> >                 >>>>> myself as the maintainer (nor do I show up in
> >                 the pulldown)
> >                 >>>>>
> >                 >>>>> Thx. (again!)
> >                 >>>>>
> >                 >>>>> ERROR:
> >                 >>>>>
> >                 >>>>> Only the lead maintainer of the package or PEAR
> >                 administrators can edit the
> >                 >>>>> maintainers.
> >                 >>>>>
> >                 >>>>>
> >                 >>>>>
> >                 >>>>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Jim Jagielski
> >                 <[email protected]> wrote:
> >                 >>>>>>
> >                 >>>>>> thx! :)
> >                 >>>>>>
> >                 >>>>>>
> >                 >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Johannes
> >                 Schlüter <[email protected]>
> >                 >>>>>> wrote:
> >                 >>>>>>>
> >                 >>>>>>> On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 12:58 -0400, Jim
> >                 Jagielski wrote:
> >                 >>>>>>>> Thx... just req'd it. Had to request a
> >                 different username (jimjag2)
> >                 >>>>>>>> since
> >                 >>>>>>>> the registration page knows about my current
> >                 account name (jimjag) and
> >                 >>>>>>>> refuses to let me request that one (as it
> >                 should).
> >                 >>>>>>>
> >                 >>>>>>> Ah, I didn't check the requests, just opened
> >                 accounts. Your old request
> >                 >>>>>>> was still there, granted that.
> >                 >>>>>>>
> >                 >>>>>>> johannes
> >                 >>>>>>>
> >                 >>>>>>
> >                 >>>>>
> >                 >
> >
> >                 > --
> >                 > PECL development discussion Mailing List
> >                 (http://pecl.php.net/)
> >                 > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >                 >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>

Reply via email to