Brad Velander wrote:
> Dennis, Bob,
>       Typically I will have my PCB on the left monitor and a schematic page 
> on the right monitor for most of my work and this works pretty well because 
> at that time I am not doing a lot of schematic edits (on the right monitor). 
> When I am working on only schematics I will commonly have two schematic 
> pages, visible and split equally between the two monitors. While editing 
> schematics in this manner, working on the right schematic/monitor, the bug 
> involving the split between monitors moving rears it's head randomly.
> 
>       If I am editing the schematic on the right monitor and I just click 
> somewhere along roughly a vertical line approx. 75% across the right monitor, 
> the split between the two schematics will jump to approx. that point. Making 
> the left schematic page cover 1.5 - 1.75 percent of the total work area. It 
> is somewhat random or possibly it is just a very precise thin target line 
> that you don't click on it very often (just a simple click, no operation 
> specified at the time, typically I am making sure the focus is on that 
> schematic on the right monitor and not the schematic on the left monitor).
> 
>       I don't know how better to put it into words, the vertical line is not 
> an actual line/wire in the schematic though, it is just some arbitrary 
> vertical axis in the work area of the right monitor. This is very consistent 
> across our three PCB designer's work stations, so it is not just me or my 
> computer/install. They are all different machines, with different video 
> cards, monitors, CPUs, etc., so it is also not a computer/driver/config issue.
> 
> Sincerely,
> Brad Velander
> Senior PCB Designer
> Northern Airborne Technology
> #14 - 1925 Kirschner Road,
> Kelowna, BC, V1Y 4N7.
> tel (250) 763-2232 ext. 225
> fax (250) 762-3374
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dennis Saputelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 8:37 PM
> To: Protel EDA Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Mouse Scroll Wheel in Protel 99SE/Dual Screens
> 
> 
> this sounds about consistent with what brad & i have said
> 
> brad, i didn't notice it (sch issue) as closely as you did but putting 
> the sch on one monitor solved the issue, too bad
> 
> AD6 doesn't do this and am also playing with manual routing, it seems 
> pretty good and smart at that but i am nowhere up to speed on the program
> 
> ds
> 
>  
> ____________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum
> 
> To Post messages:
> mailto:[email protected]
> 
> Unsubscribe and Other Options:
> http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com
> 
> Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>  
> Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
Brad,
As a workaround, have you tried changing Windows preferences so that 
focus follows the cursor without requiring a click (available in XP, at 
least)? I forget how I did it, but I have been using this feature for 
some time and find it very useful when working with the two screens.
I first encountered this behaviour on a Linux box running KDE where I 
think it may have been the default or, at least, offered when setting 
up. BTW, moving the mouse shifts focus but will not bring a window to 
the front of another overlaid on. That requires a click.

Bob


---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0625-6, 22/06/2006
Tested on: 23/06/2006 10:16:00 AM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com




 
____________________________________________________________
You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum

To Post messages:
mailto:[email protected]

Unsubscribe and Other Options:
http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com

Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
 
Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to