Frederik, List: On Sep 17, 2014, at 4:08 PM, Frederik Stjernfelt wrote:
> 1) simple metabolism, self-sustaining chemaical cycles - whose > self-sustainment implies they are prone to adapt to searching for the > compounds they need to continue the cycle, Huh? I am unaware of any such "cycles". Once again, I find your assertions about the foundations of chemical logic to be a philosophical perspective that is not consistent with the empirical logic of biochemical facts. Perhaps you could search for a touch of realism that might provide a foundation for this assertion? Philosophically, one could start CSP's arguments wrt to mode of being (as in the Lady Welby letter) with the metaphysical notions of identity and relation. Secondly, you may wish to consider the physical conservation laws. Thirdly, you may wish to attempt to relate such assertions to the conceptualization of atomic numbers. IMHO, this assertion casts' a dark shadow on your central thesis of "Natural Propositions". Cheers jerry
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
