Gary F wrote in the following link: "As De Tienne (2006) explains: Peirce's elaborate discussion of dicisigns or propositions (100614-1) in the Syllabus of 1903 (EP2: 27585, 29499) and in New Elements (EP2: 30824) demonstrates clearly how such propositions always involve iconic and indexical elements . . . "
I am puzzled. How can a dicisign (or propositions) have an icon as its object ? According to the 10 classes of signs, there are only 3 dicisigns that implicate icons -- dicent indexical sinsign, decent indexical legisign, and decent symbolic legisign. There is no decent iconic qulaisign, nor decent iconic sinsign, nor decent iconic legisign, because these violate the so-called 'Peircean selection rule', according to the quark model of the Peircean sign. With all the best. Sung ___________________________________________________ Sungchul Ji, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy Rutgers University Piscataway, N.J. 08855 732-445-4701 www.conformon.net > re Peircean information, there's also my 2010 paper on it, but it's rather > long ... > http://www.gnusystems.ca/Rehabit.htm > > gary f. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jon Awbrey [mailto:jawb...@att.net] > Sent: 6-Oct-14 8:54 AM > To: 'Peirce List' > Cc: biosemiot...@lists.ut.ee > Subject: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Natural Propositions, Chapter 3.6 > > Re: Gary Fuhrman > At:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14544 > > Gary, Howard, & All, > > Between the iPhone spitting out some bytes it found not to its taste and > the > Auto(spell)bot rewriting wrong some of my writes, I'm afraid the > information > in my last message got more than a bit corrupted, so here it is by another > channel: > > It is necessary to distinguish information from measures of information. > Peirce's concept of information is compatible with but generalizes > Shannon's. > > A good way to get a start on understanding Peirce's idea of information is > to read what he writes about it in his 1865-1866 lectures on the Logic of > Science. > > See also my notes: > > http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/Information_%3D_Comprehension_×_Ex > tension > > Regards, > > Jon > > -- > > academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey > my word press blog: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/ inquiry list: > http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/ > isw: http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/JLA > oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey > facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache > >
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
