Jon wrote:
(100714-1)
"In computer science, especially in AI, one runs smack dab into the problem
of integrating data-driven and concept-driven aspects of intelligent
functioning. . .data-driven and concept-driven aspects of intelligent
functioning."
Am I right to assume the following approximations ?
data-driven = denote = breadth = . . . ;
concept-driven = connote = depth = . . . .
With all the best.
Sung
__________________________________________________
Sungchul Ji, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy
Rutgers University
Piscataway, N.J. 08855
732-445-4701
www.conformon.net
> Thread:
> JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14551
> JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14559
> ET:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14561
>
> Edwina, List,
>
> I decided the other title was too long, and I like the acronym STOI much
> better.
>
> It's not so much that we touch on learning and reasoning just now as the
> fact
> that we've been immersed in them all along.
>
> In every realm of inquiry we encounter complementaries, dualities, or
> trade-offs
> between two aspects of the phenomena we are trying to understand. Viewed
> in the
> setting of a triadic sign relation that encompasses all the relevant
> objects and
> all the signs and ideas we have of them, we can often recognize these
> aspects as
> corresponding to the denotative and connotative planes of that sign
> relation.
>
> In computer science, especially in AI, one runs smack dab into the problem
> of
> integrating data-driven and concept-driven aspects of intelligent
> functioning.
> You find yourself recapitulating in the ontogeny of your software
> development
> something like the phylogeny of classical oppositions between empiricists
> and
> rationalists.
>
> Well, it's late ...
>
> Jon
>
> Edwina Taborsky wrote:
> > If we are to touch on learning and reasoning, it might be fruitful to
> > expand the research domain of this blog to include the research areas
> of
> > such people as Leonid Perlovsky and Ricardo Gudwin. Both of them are
> > involved in cognition, semiotics, learning, evolution. That is, most of
> > this list (Peirce list) and its discussions seems devoted to the purely
> > theoretical area of the philosophical domains of Peirce. These two (and
> > others) are focused on the applied, pragmatic domains of cognition,
> > semiotics, artificial intelligence, bioengineering, and etc. And yes,
> > both of them have explored Peirce.
> >
> > http://www.leonid-perlovsky.com/
> >
> > http://faculty.dca.fee.unicamp.br/gudwin/node/2
> >
>
> --
>
> academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey
> my word press blog: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/
> inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
> isw: http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/JLA
> oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey
> facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache
>
Sungchul Ji, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy
Rutgers University
Piscataway, N.J. 08855
732-445-4701
www.conformon.net
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
