> On Aug 3, 2016, at 12:04 PM, CLARK GOBLE <[email protected]> wrote: > > More or less Peirce sees what we might call computation is broadly mind. This > means mind can’t be separated out from practices and comportments. So to > limit the mind to the brain or even the nervous system is wrong because > something fundamental is lost. The mental part of walking can’t be logically > separated out from the legs to just the brain or even nervous system.
I should add I know most of the posters are familiar with all this. I didn't mean to come off condescending. On mailing lists I typically write for casual readers of the list and not just the person I’m responding to. I think the problem of consciousness in Peirce is interesting though and not entirely well developed.
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
