> On Sep 10, 2016, at 8:03 PM, Jerry Rhee <jerryr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I wonder, though, how many Peirceans even know what Prigogine means by > pluralism in physical laws, never mind physicists.
I confess I had to look it up even though it’s right down my alley. Latour and Prigogine have some overlap in many ways. I fully agree that seeing philosophy of science from this quasi-epistemological perspective of Peirce’s vagueness is helpful. Usually when a pragmatist gets talked about relative to pluralism it’s Dewey not Peirce who gets the mention though.
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
