Ben N., List: I appreciate the suggestion, and Chiasson's article is interesting. However, I find it rather implausible that a work entitled "A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God" was somehow intended to be more about "the *attitude *and *method *from which all decisions of importance to the conduct of a life should begin," such that the content of the hypothesis itself is secondary or even irrelevant.
Regards, Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA Professional Engineer, Amateur Philosopher, Lutheran Layman www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt - twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Ben Novak <trevriz...@gmail.com> wrote: > Clark, Jon, Jerry, Edwina, List: > > Perhaps this essay can help in finding what Peirce meant by speaking of > this "theory of thinking" in the Neglected Argument: > > http://www.iupui.edu/~arisbe/menu/library/aboutcsp/chiasson/revisit.htm > > Ben N. > > *Ben Novak <http://bennovak.net>* > 5129 Taylor Drive, Ave Maria, FL 34142 > Telephone: (814) 808-5702 > > *"All art is mortal, **not merely the individual artifacts, but the arts > themselves.* *One day the last portrait of Rembrandt* *and the last bar > of Mozart will have ceased to be—**though possibly a colored canvas and a > sheet of notes may remain—**because the last eye and the last ear > accessible to their message **will have gone." *Oswald Spengler >
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
