Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Did Peirce Anticipate the Space-Time Continuum?

[Mike Bergman]

Gary, List, Please thank Fernando for his suggestion. The entire volume seems to have some unique perspectives on Peirce; I will try to obtain a copy of the entire book. I found the Sfendoni-Mentzou piece very thought provoking. I note he thanks Nicolaidis (spelled Nikolaidis), the source of the original paper that started this thread, who was a colleague at the same institution. I'm still wondering how widely these views were held. Thanks! Mike On 5/15/2017 11:24 AM, Gary Richmond wrote: Mike, Jon, List,  I asked Fernando Zalamea--my go-to scholar for questions regarding mathematical continutiy--and, while he noted that physics is not at all his field, he responded by writing (in part): FZ: I imagine that the Proceedings of the Harvard Sesquicentennial dedicated to Peirce’s Physics may have clues. [note: for the Proceedings, see; http://catalogue.wellcomelibrary.org/search~S8?/aCharles+S.+Peirce+Sesquicentennial+International+Congress+%281989+%3A+Harvard+University%29/acharles+s+peirce+sesquicentennial+international+congress+++++1989+harvard+university/-3,-1,0,B/browse for the contents of papers selected by Matthew Moore from the Proceedings see,  http://catalogue.wellcomelibrary.org/record=b1023422  One paper in that collection by D. Sfendoni-Mentzou has the intriguing title, The role of potentiality in Peirce's tychism and in contemporary discussions in quantum mechanics and microphysics ; see: http://www.academia.edu/20431455/THE_ROLE_OF_POTENTIALITY_IN_PEIRCES_TYCHISM_AND_IN_CONTEMPORARY_DISCUSSIONS_IN_QUANTUM_MECHANICS_AND_MICROPHYSICS GR] FZ: On the other hand, as far as I know, relational logic is far from quantum logic. This second trend originates with von Neumann's Continuous Geometries and orthomodular lattices, something that, I think, Peirce could not envision. (emphasis added) I have not yet read the paper you pointed to Mike (I intend to), but although I have sometimes thought otherwise (based principally on a readong of the 1898 lecture series, published as Reasoning and the Logic of Things), I would at present  temd tp agree with Zalamea here. And I  agree with the whole of Jon Awbrey's post leading to his conclusion: JA:  I think the full import of [Peirce's] on-theoretic and pragmatic-semiotic approaches to scientific inquiry is a task for the future to work out. Best, Gary R Gary Richmond Philosophy and Critical Thinking Communication Studies LaGuardia College of the City University of New York C 745 718 482-5690 On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Jon Awbrey <jawb...@att.net> wrote: Mike, List, The mathematical perspectives and theories that made modern physics possible, perhaps even inevitable, were developed by many mathematicians, both abstract and applied, all throughout the 19th Century.  There was a definite sea change in the way scientists began to view the relationship between mathematical models and the physical world, passing from a monolithic concept to variational choices among multiple approaches, models, perspectives, and theories. Peirce was an astute observer and active participant in this transformation but it has always been difficult to trace his true impact on its course — so much of what he contributed operated underground, rhizome like, and without recognition. But I think it's fair to say that Peirce articulated the springs and catches of the workings of science better than any other reflective practitioner in his or subsequent times.  And I think the full import of his information-theoretic and pragmatic-semiotic approaches to scientific inquiry is a task for the future to work out. Regards, Jon On 5/14/2017 1:34 AM, Mike Bergman wrote: I just encountered this assertion: "In the present work we have indicated that a form of logic, relational logic developed by C. S. Peirce, may serve as the foundation of both quantum mechanics and string theory." [1] Does the list have any comments, further references or criticisms on this pretty bold statement? Thanks, Mike [1] A. Nicolaidis, 2008. "Categorical Foundation of Quantum Mechanics and String Theory," arXiv:0812.1946, 10 Dec 2008. See https://arxiv.org/pdf/0812.1946.pdf -- inquiry into inquiry: https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/ academia: https://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey oeiswiki: https://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey isw: http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/JLA facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache ----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .

-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .