BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px; }Stephen - Peirce was 'Aristotelian' in issues about Matter and Form; and the primacy of sensate data in our experience - and the nature of Reality vs the individual Existence. But - Aristotle's evolution theory was - as he points out - metaphysical, in that it has nothing to do with material or mental interaction, i.e., with semiosics. The Platonic and Aristotelian theory of evolution was that each species was 'fixed' and did not adapt/evolve into another species. This of course fit into the Christian view of Creationism and also, of the societal view that 'you were born into your class [i.e., as a peasant vs lord].
Aristotle's view was almost a beautiful architecture - all species had their allotted space and role in this 'great chain of being' from the simple to the complex. The concept that change was within the life-forms rather than a priori, and self-organized, and developed within individual organisms - by the random mutations of Darwinism [Note: this randomness is challenged in modern biology] - went against the stable architecture of Aristotle. And of course - this Darwinian-Wallace idea, that change was natural, was self-organized - crept into the sociopolitical ideology as well...and the old static, stable class hierarchy began to collapse. Edwina On Mon 12/02/18 10:22 AM , "Stephen C. Rose" stever...@gmail.com sent: 173. But fallibilism cannot be appreciated in anything like its true significancy until evolution has been considered. This is what the world has been most thinking of for the last forty years -- though old enough is the general idea itself. Aristotle's philosophy, that dominated the world for so many ages and still in great measure tyrannizes over the thoughts of butchers and bakers that never heard of him -- is but a metaphysical evolutionism. Peirce: CP 1.174 Cross-Ref:†† Interesting. Has anyone done a study of Peirce and Aristotle. In what did Peirce's alleged tyranny consist? This is in something I found in an old book I have but it is also in CP. Did classify Aristotle as a dualist or nominalist? Or more narrowly as here? amazon.com/author/stephenrose [1] Links: ------ [1] http://amazon.com/author/stephenrose
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .