List:

Still attempting to avoid any interpretive commentary just yet, here is
what those quotes tell us about Quasi-minds, in their likely order of
composition.

   - EP 2:389 - Every Sign, or nearly every Sign, is a determination of a
   Quasi-mind.
   - EP 2:391 - The Object determines the Sign only in the respect that
   enables the Sign to act upon the interpreting Quasi-mind as if the Object
   itself were acting upon it.
   - EP 2:391 - A Sign is best regarded as a determination of a Quasi-mind,
   rather than as an outward object that addresses itself to a Quasi-mind.
   - EP 2:544n22 - A Sign is a medium for communication of a Form among at
   least two (if not three) Quasi-minds.
   - EP 2:544n22 - Quasi-minds are things capable of varied determination
   as to Forms of the kind communicated, but it is not logically necessary
   that they possess consciousness.
   - EP 2:545n25 - A Quasi-mind is a perfect Sign, the aggregate formed by
   a Sign and all the Signs which its occurrence carries with it.
   - EP 2:545n25 - A Quasi-mind is the sheet of assertion of Existential
   Graphs.
   - EP 2:545n25 - A Quasi-mind is, like anything else, susceptible to
   determination in a certain way; and each such determination is an event
   occurring once for all and never again.
   - SS 195 - Every Sign must be a determination of a Quasi-mind, which is
   itself a determinable Sign, even if that Quasi-mind is one's future self.
   - CP 4.536 - A Sign produces an Interpretant in the Quasi-mind that is
   its interpreter by determining the latter to a feeling, exertion, or Sign.
   - CP 4.550 - Whatever represents The Truth in our Diagram must be
   regarded as the Quasi-mind of all the Signs represented on it.
   - CP 4.550 - Signs so connected that a complex of two of them can have
   one Interpretant are the determinations of one Sign, which is a Quasi-mind.
   - CP 4.551 - Connected Signs must have a Quasi-mind, and there are no
   isolated Signs.
   - CP 4.551 - Every Sign requires at least two distinct Quasi-minds, a
   Quasi-utterer and a Quasi-interpreter, which are at one (welded) in the
   Sign itself.
   - CP 4.553 - The Phemic Sheet is the Quasi-mind, which is determined by
   the Graph-instances scribed on it, and in which the Graphist and
   Interpreter are at one.
   - CP 4.553 - This Quasi-mind is a Seme of The Truth, the widest Universe
   of Reality, and a Pheme of all that is tacitly taken for granted between
   the Graphist and Interpreter.

Peirce wrote all of these passages during the early months of 1906--the EP
manuscripts in January, the SS letter in March, and the CP article in May
(published in October).  Consequently, it is reasonable to assume that they
are mutually consistent, and attempt to ascertain *his *concept of a
Quasi-mind accordingly.  Combining and rearranging the information
above--and thus finally injecting a little bit of interpretation on my
part--yields the following condensed version.

   1. A Quasi-mind is a *perfect *Sign, the aggregate or complex of all
   Signs that have previously determined it, which are so connected that they
   can have *one *Interpretant.
   2. A Quasi-mind is a *determinable *Sign, capable of varied
   determination as to Forms of the kind communicated by a Sign, but not
   necessarily *conscious*.
   3. Every such determination of a Quasi-mind is an *event *that occurs
   once for all and never again.
   4. A Sign cannot be isolated, but is *always *connected to other Signs,
   and thus *must *have a Quasi-mind.
   5. A Sign in fact requires at least* two* distinct Quasi-minds, its
   utterer and its interpreter, which are at one (welded) in the Sign itself.
   6. A Sign is a medium for communication of a Form *between *these
   Quasi-minds, which may be past and future versions of the *same *
   Quasi-mind.
   7. A Sign is determined by its Object *only *in the respect that enables
   it to act upon a Quasi-mind (its interpreter) *as if* the Object itself
   were acting upon that Quasi-mind.
   8. A Sign is the determination of a Quasi-mind (its interpreter) to
   produce a feeling, exertion, or other Sign *as *its Interpretant.
   9. A Sign is best regarded as this *determination *of a Quasi-mind (its
   interpreter), rather than as an outward *Object *that addresses itself
   to that Quasi-mind.
   10. For Existential Graphs, the sheet of assertion or Phemic Sheet that
   represents *The Truth* is the Quasi-mind of all Signs scribed on it, in
   which the Graphist and Interpreter are at one.
   11. This Quasi-mind is a *Seme *[Rheme] of the widest Universe of
   Reality, and a *Pheme *[Dicisign] of all that is tacitly taken for
   granted between the Graphist and Interpreter.

Does anything here seem incongruent with the original quotes, or have I
accurately summarized them?

Thanks,

Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Professional Engineer, Amateur Philosopher, Lutheran Layman
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt - twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to