Gary R,
You wrote: > Nevertheless, your other points are well-taken. Even in speculative > grammar, Peirce replaces qualisign/sinsign/legisign (1903) with > tone/token/type (1906-1908) and experiments further with alternatives for > "tone." However, most of that is in unpublished manuscripts and personal > letters, so it seems harsh to criticize him as violating his own ethics of > terminology where he is not deliberately writing for the wider scientific > community. In our current context, I fully agree that we are each making > "good faith attempts to arrive at a terminology we can serviceably use in > discussing Peirce's phaneroscopic practice." > Udell. > -- The experimentation with different terms pertaining to the sigfn regarded in itself has nothing to do with ethics of tewrminology or wider audience. It is a justified differentiation of different perspectives on the same joint in the proces of semiosis. Auke >
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the message and nothing in the body. More at https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html . ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.
