Dear Jerry,
Not sure about all of that, but I do remember having
long discussions on the List about what used to be
a fairly standard Peircean idea that percepts,
the very data of the senses, are signs.
Regards,
Jon
On 8/24/2021 7:05 PM, Jerry LR Chandler wrote:
List:
On Aug 24, 2021, at 11:39 AM,
On the contrary, André is explicitly discussing phaneroscopy, not semeiotic.
This sentence is a remarkable example of how emotional rhetorical thrusts
generate the thoughts that make no sense in the language of CSP.
Units of thoughts have units of meaning. These two concepts are inseparable.
In the engineering sciences, especially the epistemology and ontology of
pragmatic necessities, the connections between phaneroscopy and semiotics are
essential to ethical actions.
The graphic diagrams that illustrate the iconic forms of engineering work
connect, necessarily, the semeiotic with the phaneroscopy. Indeed, the
connections of symbols with the indices of the diagrams derived from semiotic
and phaneroscopy could be a central thesis of engineering sciences.
Cheers
Jerry
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu
with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the message and nothing in the
body. More at https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html .
► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and
co-managed by him and Ben Udell.
