List: > On Aug 24, 2021, at 11:39 AM, > > On the contrary, André is explicitly discussing phaneroscopy, not semeiotic.
This sentence is a remarkable example of how emotional rhetorical thrusts generate the thoughts that make no sense in the language of CSP. Units of thoughts have units of meaning. These two concepts are inseparable. In the engineering sciences, especially the epistemology and ontology of pragmatic necessities, the connections between phaneroscopy and semiotics are essential to ethical actions. The graphic diagrams that illustrate the iconic forms of engineering work connect, necessarily, the semeiotic with the phaneroscopy. Indeed, the connections of symbols with the indices of the diagrams derived from semiotic and phaneroscopy could be a central thesis of engineering sciences. Cheers Jerry
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the message and nothing in the body. More at https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html . ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.
