Re: Re: Re: Pro-ITN Libel Suit Post

[Doug Henwood]

Michael Keaney wrote:

>I recall correctly Louis Proyect has already highlighted the dubious
>activities of LM to PEN-L; in fact, didn't Doug Henwood get some stick for
>having an article published there?

Yes, and so what? "Dubious activities" are not enough of a 
justification to put a magazine out of business, especially one that 
was critical of the imperial war propaganda juggernaut. British libel 
laws are an international disgrace, and this verdict is disgraceful.

By the way, this outcome undermines the argument that LM is some 
sinister tool of British capital, doesn't it?

Doug