Tom writes: > >The problem is that the debate will be limited to bailing out the big >bourgeoisie with cuts in the Federal funds rate and cheap funds at the >discount window. If the Fed chose instead to give every citizen a $1,000 >grant, I don't think anybody would argue that the powers of financial >policy are limited. > >Edwin (Tom) Dickens > This is such a good point! I have always found the debates about "is monetary policy effective" on the left to be very sterile. Whether or not fed funds increases lead to investment declines, one thing is certain about the impact of monetary policy -- it keeps money in the hands of the rich. Forget about giving everyone $1000. How about giving low-cost loans to build affordable housing, or day-cares, or schools, or solar power research? Instead the Fed restricts its lending to financial institutions. Ellen
- Re: entier's hoarding ? Ted Winslow
- Re: Re: Re: Re: ? Rentier's hoarding ? Jim Devine
- Rentier's hoarding ? Louis Proyect
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ? Rentier's hoarding ? Ted Winslow
- Re: Tom Dickens on Monetary Policy Paul_A
- Re: Re: Tom Dickens on Monetary Policy Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Tom Dickens on Monetary Policy Edwin Dickens
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Tom Dickens on Monetary Policy Edwin Dickens
- Monetary Tightening Jim Devine
- Re: Monetary Tightening Carrol Cox
- funny money vs. soaking the fat boys Ellen Frank
- funny money vs. soaking the fat boys Doug Henwood
- Re: funny money vs. soaking the fat boys Ellen Frank
- Re: Re: funny money vs. soaking the fat boys Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: funny money vs. soaking the fat boys Ellen Frank
- Marx and financial crises Edwin Dickens
- Re: Marx and financial crises Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Marx and financial crises Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Marx and financial crises Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Marx and financial crises Edwin Dickens
- Re: Re: Re: Marx and financial crises Michael Perelman