Jim Devine wrote: > 125 basis points > -- 1.25 percentage points What is the use of a technical term that is*never* (it seems) used without being followed by a parenthetical definition. I have noticed this phenomenon over the years even in financial columns (for example in the WSJ) the readers of which are presumably fairly sophisticated. Yet writers almost never trust their readers to know what "basis points" mean. :-) Carrol
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Rentier's hoarding ? Doug Henwood
- Re: entier's hoarding ? Ted Winslow
- Re: Re: Re: Re: ? Rentier's hoarding ? Jim Devine
- Rentier's hoarding ? Louis Proyect
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ? Rentier's hoarding ? Ted Winslow
- Re: Tom Dickens on Monetary Policy Paul_A
- Re: Re: Tom Dickens on Monetary Policy Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Tom Dickens on Monetary Policy Edwin Dickens
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Tom Dickens on Monetary Policy Edwin Dickens
- Monetary Tightening Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Tom Dickens on Monetary Policy Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Tom Dickens on Monetary Policy Ellen Frank
- funny money vs. soaking the fat boys Doug Henwood
- Re: funny money vs. soaking the fat boys Ellen Frank
- Re: Re: funny money vs. soaking the fat boys Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: funny money vs. soaking the fat boys Ellen Frank
- Marx and financial crises Edwin Dickens
- Re: Marx and financial crises Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Marx and financial crises Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Marx and financial crises Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Marx and financial crises Edwin Dickens