Jim Devine wrote: >what's wrong with the > Nordhaus theory? My main complaint is that the recovery from an energy > crisis might easily be extremely painful and take a long time It might take several million years, and I'm not really joking. What are the alternatives to fossil? (don't please mention PV's, wind, hydrogen etc, because they are not alternatives) Mark We're supposed to get excited about a catastrophe that occurs one million years hence????? mbs
- Re: energy crises Jim Devine
- Re: Re: energy crises Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: energy crises Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: energy crises Eugene Coyle
- Re: Re: Re: Re: energy crises Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: energy crises Michael Perelman
- RE: Re: energy crises Mark Jones
- Re: RE: Re: energy crises Doug Henwood
- RE: Re: RE: Re: energy crises Max Sawicky
- RE: RE: Re: RE: Re: energy crises Mark Jones
- RE: RE: RE: Re: energy crises Max Sawicky
- RE: RE: RE: Re: energy crises Mark Jones
- Re: RE: RE: RE: Re: energy crises Max Sawicky
- Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: Re: energy crises M A Jones
- Re: RE: Re: energy crises Jim Devine
- RE: Re: RE: Re: energy crises Mark Jones
- Re: Re: energy crises Bill Burgess
- RE: Re: Re: energy crises Mark Jones
- Re: RE: Re: Re: energy crises Brad De Long
- Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: energy crises M A Jones
- Re: RE: energy crises Bill Burgess