At 11:42 AM 6/27/00 -0700, you wrote: >Nordhaus assumed that there would always be an available "backstop" >technology. I think that he had nukes in mind at the time. yeah, he assumed that nuclear power was a good thing. This suggests that he should have taken externalities into account. Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
- Re: Re: My looniness Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: RE: My looniness Ken Hanly
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: My looniness Rod Hay
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: My looniness Ken Hanly
- Re: My looniness Carrol Cox
- RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE:"We used 10 times as muc... Mark Jones
- Re: RE:"We used 10 times as much energy in ... Eugene Coyle
- RE: Re: RE:"We used 10 times as much en... Mark Jones
- Re: energy crises Jim Devine
- Re: Re: energy crises Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: energy crises Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: energy crises Eugene Coyle
- Re: Re: Re: Re: energy crises Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: energy crises Michael Perelman
- RE: Re: energy crises Mark Jones
- Re: RE: Re: energy crises Doug Henwood
- RE: Re: RE: Re: energy crises Max Sawicky
- RE: RE: Re: RE: Re: energy crises Mark Jones
- RE: RE: Re: energy crises Max Sawicky
- RE: RE: RE: Re: energy crises Mark Jones
- Re: RE: RE: RE: Re: energy crises Max Sawicky