Brad, the Cliff Notes statement was wrong, but I thought that you jumped
it up a couple of notches.
>
> >Brad DeLong wrote:
> >
> >> Bullshit. You meant it as a personal attack.
> >
> >Brad, this is a bit over the top. He merely said that you commented on
> >the book without without reading it. Your thought seems to have been
> >that you didn't need to read it.
>
> My, my...
>
> I wasn't *asked* to read the book. And then, because I hadn't read
> it, I was told that "it seems that students who read Cliff's Notes
> instead of the book are following professorial example."
>
> That's bait-and-switch followed by a personal insult. That is not
> "merely saying that [I] commented on the book without reading it.
>
> And I'm entitled to call it "bullshit." Because that's what it is...
>
>
> Brad DeLong
>
>
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
