N�stor wrote: >"Take off", that is a foolish substitute for national revolution. It's interesting that this is the mirror image of WW Rostow's view that communism is a disease of the take-off. (But he saw some "communist" countries as having taken off.) BTW, I've been thinking that WWR was dead. Is he? Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Where are the econom... Michael Yates
- Re: Re: Re: Where are the economists? Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Where are the econom... Michael Yates
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Where are the econom... Brad DeLong
- Re: Re: Re: Where are the economists? Brad DeLong
- Re: Re: Where are the economists? Rob Schaap
- Re: Re: Re: Where are the economists? Brad DeLong
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Where are the economists... Louis Proyect
- WWR & mysteries of the organism Jim Devine
- Re: WWR & mysteries of the organ... Nestor Miguel Gorojovsky
- Re: Re: Re: WWR & mysteries ... Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: WWR & myste... Nestor Miguel Gorojovsky
- Re: Re: Re: Re: WWR &am... Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: WWR & myste... Michael Hoover
- Need Help! Ajit Sinha
- Re: Re: WWR & mysteries of t... Brad DeLong
- Re: Re: Re: WWR & myste... Nestor Miguel Gorojovsky
- RE: Where are the economists? Forstater, Mathew
- RE: Re: Re: Re: Where are the economists? Forstater, Mathew
