>I'm going to add one minor refinement to Carrols argument (for which of >course he is in no way responsible). > >The lesser of two evils arguement is one that will be available to the >Democratic party as long as we have a two party system. This is because >the Republicans are guaranteed to always run someone worse. Yep. That's why you vote for the Democrats, at least if you are interested in something other than self-expression... Brad DeLong
- Re: Re: Re: Re: voting for Nader Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: voting for Nader Brad DeLong
- voting for Nader Michael Perelman
- Re: voting for Nader Brad DeLong
- Re: Re: voting for Nader Michael Perelman
- Re: voting for Nader enilsson
- Re: Re: voting for Nader Carrol Cox
- Voting Nader will Undermine Labor Rights (Re: vo... Nathan Newman
- Re: Re: Re: voting for Nader Eugene Coyle
- Re: Re: Re: Re: voting for Nader Gar Lipow
- Re: voting for Nader Brad DeLong
- Re: voting for Nader Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: voting for Nader enilsson
- Re: Re: Re: Re: voting for Nader Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: voting for Nader Max Sawicky
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: voting for Nader Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: voting for Nader Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: voting for Nader Brad DeLong
- RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: voting for Nader Max Sawicky
- re: voting for Nader Nathan Newman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: voting for Nader Jim Devine
