Michael Perelman wrote: >True enough, but don't the adverse consequences of tobacco hit the >working-class >harder? So, discouraging smoking by taxes might have positive >consequences over the >long run. Shouldn't people decide for themselves whether to smoke? Do you think you should prescribe their diet too? Doug
- Re: Re: yet another US electile disfunction commenta... Max Sawicky
- Re: Re: Re: yet another US electile disfunction... Ken Hanly
- Re: Re: Re: Re: yet another US electile dis... Max Sawicky
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: yet another US elec... Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: yet another US elec... Ken Hanly
- Re: yet another US electile disfunc... Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Re: yet another US electil... Ken Hanly
- Re: yet another US electile disfunction comment... Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Re: yet another US electile disfunction... Michael Perelman
- Vodka & Perestroika (was Re: yet an... Yoshie Furuhashi
- RE: Re: Re: Re: yet another US electile... Doug Henwood
- RE: Re: Re: Re: yet another US elec... Lisa & Ian Murray
- Re: Re: Re: Re: yet another US elec... Michael Perelman
- RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: yet anothe... Lisa & Ian Murray
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: yet anothe... Ken Hanly
- Re: yet another US electile di... Yoshie Furuhashi
- Blinded by Poverty Peter Dorman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: yet another US elec... Eugene Coyle
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: yet anothe... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: yet an... Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ye... Doug Henwood