> > Michael Perelman wrote: > > >True enough, but don't the adverse consequences of tobacco hit the > >working-class > >harder? So, discouraging smoking by taxes might have positive > >consequences over the > >long run. > > Shouldn't people decide for themselves whether to smoke? Do you think > you should prescribe their diet too? > > Doug ********* Or how they organize the means of production? Slippery slopery, Ian
- Re: Re: Re: yet another US electile disfunction comm... Ken Hanly
- Re: Re: Re: Re: yet another US electile disfunc... Max Sawicky
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: yet another US electile... Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: yet another US electile... Ken Hanly
- Re: yet another US electile disfunction... Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Re: yet another US electile dis... Ken Hanly
- Re: yet another US electile disfunction commentary Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Re: yet another US electile disfunction com... Michael Perelman
- Vodka & Perestroika (was Re: yet anothe... Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Re: Re: yet another US electile disfunc... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: yet another US electile... Lisa & Ian Murray
- Re: Re: Re: Re: yet another US electile... Michael Perelman
- RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: yet another US ... Lisa & Ian Murray
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: yet another US ... Ken Hanly
- Re: yet another US electile disfunc... Yoshie Furuhashi
- Blinded by Poverty Peter Dorman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: yet another US electile... Eugene Coyle
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: yet another US ... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: yet another... Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: yet ano... Doug Henwood
- RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: yet... Lisa & Ian Murray
