Ken says: >Be serious. THe idiotic policy implication does not follow at all. Smoking >decreases the quality and length of life for the smoker and others. The >point of the argument is to refute the claim that there should be a charge >against tobacco companies and users because smokers cost the medical system >more. In Canada this specious and incorrect claim is perhaps more effective >since we have a universal medicare system. You mean that Canadians tend to fall for the idea that since the state provides for health care, the state is entitled to punish unhealthy choices, behaviors, activities, etc.? Yoshie
- yet another US electile disfunction commentary Jim Devine
- Re: yet another US electile disfunction comment... Nathan Newman
- Re: Re: yet another US electile disfunction... Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: yet another US electile disfunction... Max Sawicky
- Re: Re: Re: yet another US electile dis... Ken Hanly
- Re: Re: Re: Re: yet another US elec... Max Sawicky
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: yet anothe... Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: yet anothe... Ken Hanly
- Re: Re: yet another US ele... Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Re: yet another US... Ken Hanly
- Re: yet another US electile disfunction... Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Re: yet another US electile dis... Michael Perelman
- Vodka & Perestroika (was R... Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Re: Re: yet another US ele... Doug Henwood
- RE: Re: Re: Re: yet anothe... Lisa & Ian Murray
- Re: Re: Re: Re: yet anothe... Michael Perelman
- RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: ye... Lisa & Ian Murray
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ye... Ken Hanly
- Re: yet another US ele... Yoshie Furuhashi