At 03:42 PM 2/15/01 -0500, you wrote: > The best critique I have seen is >Heinz Kurz and Neri Salvadori, "Theories of 'Endogenous >Growth' in Historical Perspective," in _Contemporary >Economic Issues: Economic Behaviour and Design, vol. 4, >IEA Conference Volume No. 124, Proceedings of the >Eleventh World Congress of the International Economic >Association, ed. by Murat Sertel, 1999, London: Macmillan >and New York: St. Martin's, pp. 225-261. >Barkley Rosser so what, in short, is the substance of their critique? Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
- new growth theory Jim Devine
- Re: new growth theory Michael Perelman
- RE: new growth theory Forstater, Mathew
- Re: Re: new growth theory J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Re: new growth theory Jim Devine
- Re: new growth theory christian11
- Re: Re: new growth theory Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: new growth theory Christian Gregory
- Re: Re: Re: Re: new growth theory Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: new growth theory ALI KADRI
- RE: Re: Re: Re: new growth theory Forstater, Mathew
- Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: new growth theory Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: new growth theory J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: new growth theory Jim Devine
- RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: new growth the... Lisa & Ian Murray