>As Doug notes, essentially yes. > >Even among contemporary explicit Communists, the assertion that no real >socialist supports the Dems is almost definitionally a sectarian position - >which of course means that for all Lou calls for non-sectarianism, he >continues to promote it. I believe you have confused the term sectarian with revolutionary. Louis Proyect Marxism mailing list: http://www.marxmail.org
- Re: Re: Socialism & American Workers (was Re: e... Louis Proyect
- "nonsectarian party-building" Jim Devine
- Re: "nonsectarian party-building" Louis Proyect
- Re: Re: "nonsectarian party-building" Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: "nonsectarian party-building" Jim Devine
- Re: Socialism & American Workers (was Re: ergon... Nathan Newman
- Re: Re: Socialism & American Workers (was Re: e... J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Re: Re: Re: Socialism & American Workers (was R... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Socialism & American Workers (w... J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Re: Socialism & American Workers (was Re: ergon... Nathan Newman
- Re: Socialism & American Workers (was Re: ergo... Louis Proyect
- Re: Socialism & American Workers (was Re: ergo... Nathan Newman
- Re: Re: Socialism & American Workers (was Re: e... Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Socialism & American Workers (was R... Nathan Newman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Socialism & American Workers (w... Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Socialism & American Worker... Nathan Newman
- Re: Re: Socialism & American Workers (was Re: e... Michael Perelman
- Re: Socialism & American Workers (was Re: ergo... Nathan Newman
- Re: Re: Socialism & American Workers (was Re:e... Doug Henwood
- Re: Socialism & American Workers (was Re: ergon... Nathan Newman
- Re: Re: Socialism & American Workers (was Re:e... Michael Perelman