Oh, no. To solve the Transformation Problem, we need to abandon it and return to classical Marxism, which offers a more sophisticated way of looking at the world, which does not try to shove everthing into a framework of simple algebra while abandoning all pretext of dialectics. Andrew wrote: > > > > > To really solve the Transformation Problem, I think we need to wholly > > revamp our theory of value. Of course, in so doing, we will be (at > > last) abandoning classical Marxism. > > > > Andrew Hagen > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 95929 Tel. 530-898-5321 E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: US Consumer Confidence indexsurges Louis Proyect
- Re: US Consumer Confidence indexsurges J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- "Transformation problem" [was US Con... Chris Burford
- Re: "Transformation problem" Jim Devine
- Re: "Transformation problem" [wa... J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Re: "Transformation problem" [wa... Andrew Hagen
- Re: Re: "Transformation problem&q... Jim Devine
- Re: "Transformation problem&q... Andrew Hagen
- Re: Re: "Transformation ... Ken Hanly
- Re: Re: "Transformation problem&q... Ken Hanly
- Re: Re: Re: Re: "Transformati... Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: "Transfo... ALI KADRI
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: "... Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: &... ALI KADRI
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: &... ALI KADRI