David Shemano wrote: >This is a very interesting theory you have. Whatever the government does, >by definition, is in the long-term class interests of >industry/business/bourgeois/guys who wear tophats/play golf, even if the >industry strenuously opposes the government action. No wonder Marxist >analysis is never wrong. The bourgeoisie as a whole could want one thing, and specific industrial or regional interests another. Happens all the time, doesn't it? The executive branch is supposed to act in the best interests of capital as a whole. Do you read the Politics & Policy page of the Wall Street Journal, which has almost daily coverage of the role of big money in U.S. politics? Almost everything I read on that page confirms a Marxian understanding of how the state works. Doug
- Airline deregulation Seth Sandronsky
- Airline deregulation Louis Proyect
- RE: Airline deregulation David Shemano
- Re: RE: Airline deregulation Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: RE: Airline deregulation Doug Henwood
- Re: RE: Airline deregulation Louis Proyect
- RE: Re: RE: Airline deregulation David Shemano
- Re: RE: Re: RE: Airline deregulati... Louis Proyect
- RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Airline deregu... Doug Henwood
- RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Airline de... David Shemano
- Re: Airline deregulation Michael Perelman
- RE: Re: Airline deregulati... David Shemano
- Re: RE: Re: Airline deregu... Ian Murray
- Re: Re: RE: Re: Airline de... Ian Murray
- Re: RE: Re: Airline deregu... Louis Proyect
- Re: RE: Re: Airline deregu... Christian Gregory
- RE: Re: RE: Re: Airline de... David Shemano
- Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Airlin... Eugene Coyle
- Re: Re: Airline deregulati... Louis Proyect