How do you interpret this distinction? A guess: Diesing's translation
emphasizes that "the truth" as a static entity does not exist but is
rather a constantly changing process, with which it is possible (more or
less) to align the mind, but that alignment will be more or less untrued
just as it occurs. Or is it nonsense to try for an interpretation of the
difference?
Carrol
Keaney Michael wrote:
>
> Jim Devine writes:
>
> As Baran & Sweezy quote Hegel to say, "the truth is the whole."
>
> =====
>
> According to Paul Diesing, this should actually read "the true is the
> whole".
>
> Michael K.
